Number 314 December 16, 2005

This Week:

Quote of the Week
How Propaganda Works: The Profit Factor
How Propaganda Works: Transmitting Ideology

Greetings,

This week is Part 4 in the What, Who, Where, When, How, and Why of Propaganda Series.  Part 1 was the "what." Part 2 focused on "when."  Part 3 got into the "who."  And this week is "how."  The next two weeks should get into the where and why, with a conclusion that will talk about all the amazing possibilities that are available to counter this propaganda stuff, which we can start doing once we understand how it works.

Specifically, this week I talk about how the structure of the media results in Propaganda being distributed and reinforced.  The first piece talks about how the audience affects what gets in the news.  The second, and longer, piece talks about journalists themselves, and how the institution of the media virtually assures that dissenting voices will be marginalized.  This is not about how "bad" journalists are.  In fact, there are lots of really good journalists working right now.  But this series is about "the system" and how it works, which is bigger than any individual journalist.

See you next week,

Nygaard

"Quote" of the Week:

Here are the words of the brilliant Stuart Hall, who was interviewed in 1983 on the Australian Broadcasting Corporation's Doubletake.  He was responding to the question (paraphrased), "Is ideology a kind of conscious commitment to a particular philosophy?"  To which he replied:

"No, I would say not.  I mean I think there are ideologies which function like that, in more systematic, more coherent, more sustained and developed ways.  But I am particularly interested in the practical understandings, the practical frameworks which people use and which are largely unconscious.  When people say to you, 'Of course that's so, isn't it?' that 'of course' is the most ideological moment, because that's the moment at which you're least aware that you are using a particular framework, and that if you used another framework the things that you are talking about would have a different meaning."


How Propaganda Works: The Profit Factor

Here's Edward Bernays, from page 166 of his book "Propaganda:"

"The American motion picture is the greatest unconscious carrier of propaganda in the world today.  It is a great distributor for ideas and opinions.  The motion picture can standardize the ideas and habits of a nation.  Because pictures are made to meet market demands, they reflect, emphasize, and even exaggerate broad popular tendencies, rather than stimulate new ideas and opinions." [Emphasis added by Nygaard]

Bernays was writing in 1928, when movies were the dominant mode for reaching a mass, national audience.  Substitute the concept of "mass media" for "American motion picture" in the above quotation, and consider that the principle doesn't change: The key here is "meeting market demands."  For mass media to be successful--then and now--they have to refrain, as Bernays says, from "stimulating new ideas."  In other words, they have to be highly attuned to what he calls "broad popular tendencies," or what I call internalized, or "Deep," Propaganda.

In this sense, a comment by Andrew Kohut, president of the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, in the October 31st New York Times, makes a great deal of sense.  He said: "Media coverage both shapes and reflects public opinion."  Most people think it just does one or the other.  It's both.  It works very hard to "reflect" public opinion--and, as Bernays says, to "emphasize, and even exaggerate" it.  And that's because, if you offer people too much unfamiliar or challenging stuff, they will gravitate towards news sources that affirm their existing beliefs, since it is more comfortable.  And that is not hard to find.

Add to this the fact that the people whom the mass media want to reach are not just any people.   They want to reach the people who buy stuff.  Yes, affluent consumers are the people that advertisers are looking for, so a for-profit news organization must establish a relationship with them, and the more that relationship is comfortable and familiar, the more loyal those people will be, and the more profit is to be had.  So, it's predictable and understandable that the mass media, in general terms, will do as Bernays says, and avoid "stimulating new ideas and opinions."

Then, due to its power to reach huge numbers of people where they live, every day, the result of this "reflecting" is to affirm those internalized ideas, which is part of how opinions are hardened into attitudes, and thus "public opinion" is "shaped" not only while it is being reflected, but BECAUSE it is being reflected.  This is how mass media, as Bernays puts it, "standardizes the ideas and habits of a nation."

It's not a conspiracy.  It's just good business.

top

How Propaganda Works: Transmitting Ideology

I promised last week to make more clear exactly WHO does propaganda by explaining a little bit about HOW they do it.  Specifically, I want to talk about how the media and related "information workers"--without any conspiracy or even individual intention--distribute Propaganda.

I have referred to Deep Propaganda as the Propaganda ABC's because it is made up of the Attitudes, Beliefs, and Conceptions about the world that we carry inside of ourselves.  Another way to say it would be to call these ideas our "internalized ideology."  According to my Webster's Unabridged Dictionary (1983), "ideology" is "the doctrines, opinions, or way of thinking of an individual or class."

When something is internalized, it quickly becomes unconscious.  Deep Propaganda, then, can be thought of as our unconscious ideology.  The important word is unconscious.  It's important because, when something is unconscious, it is very difficult to think about it, including thinking about whether or not everything you assume to be true about the world really is true.  In fact, the only way for most people to question an unconscious idea is for someone (someone besides  themselves, that is) to bring it to their attention.  And, in order for that to happen, that other person has to be conscious that there exists another way to think about things.

So, we can see that unconscious ideas can be challenged.  But they can also be reinforced.  The interesting difference between challenging and reinforcing an idea is that, while challenging has to be done consciously, reinforcement can be done unconsciously.  If one hears an idea, or expresses an idea, repeatedly and that idea is never challenged, over time that idea becomes part of our internal landscape, and forms part of the framework for all of the new ideas that come our way.  This is how we make sense of the world.

There is a famous quotation, usually attributed to the 18th-century Anglo-Irish statesman Edmund Burke (although I went looking for the original quotation and couldn't find it), that goes like this:  "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good people do nothing."  In that sense, all that is necessary for Deep Propaganda to survive and flourish is for the people who receive it to do nothing.  And that includes not only the people who ultimately receive it--that is, you and me--but also the people who receive it for the purpose of passing it on--and those people are, among others, journalists and other media workers.

Hegemony as the "Default"

Every computer has settings that tell the computer what to do.  How wide should the margins be?  What type size do you want?  Etc.  The settings that will be used UNLESS you consciously go in and tell the computer to do something else are called the "default" settings.  That is, your computer world is set up in a certain way because the people who make the computers believe that most people like it that way.  And most people probably do.

Hegemonic ideas are like the "default" settings of a culture.  They are the "common sense" ideas that say things like, "Boys have to be tough to survive," and "The best health care goes to those with the most money," and "Supply and demand is what determines prices," and so forth.  When an idea is so widely shared that most people have internalized it, it can be said to have achieved hegemony within the culture.  The feminist movement and anti-racist organizing are examples of conscious challenges to the Deep Propaganda of the traditionally hegemonic ideas of sexism and racism.

Earlier in this series I said that "cultural hegemony" is achieved when certain attitudes, beliefs and conceptions about the world become so widely accepted in a society as to function as the de facto "organizing principles" of a society.  These "default" settings are embedded in the stories and myths that we all grow up with.  Last week I said that families, churches, schools, universities, the different branches of government, and the mass media all do their part to pass along and reinforce these ideas.

This happens in a million ways.  Certain holidays celebrate certain people (think about "Columbus Day"); shared rituals imprint versions of history into our minds (think of how many kids play "Cowboys and Indians" and "war"); certain groups of people are assigned certain characteristics in popular culture (what image comes to your mind when you hear the word "Arab?")  Stereotypes get passed on from generation to generation long after the original propaganda was produced to justify whatever injustice was going on, from the colonial expansion to slavery to various wars to whatever.

Winners, Losers, and Deep Propaganda

So, we all grow up with certain ideas, or ideology, imposed on us, and the ones that are the most common become culturally hegemonic.  That is not to say that individuals can't question, reject, and replace some of these ideas.  But, who is most likely to do so?

Consider that every culture has what might be called "winners" and "losers," in terms of wealth, power, comfort, status, and so forth.   The membership in those groups has a lot to do with the nature of the ideas that are hegemonic in that culture.  That is, in a culture with a tradition of racist ideology, members of the dominant race will tend to be winners, and members of the "minority" races will tend to be losers. (I don't mean "losers" in the moral or spiritual sense, simply in the accumulation of wealth, power, and so forth.)  In a sexist culture, men will win more often than women.  And so forth.

I suggest that the "losers" in a culture will be more likely to challenge culturally hegemonic ideas than the "winners."  After all, why would someone who is a winner wish to challenge the rules that they followed to become a winner?

Now is where we start to understand how Propaganda, especially Deep Propaganda, is perpetuated and reinforced within the culture, especially by the ever-present media.

When the powerful people who are the main sources for our news spout whatever Propaganda it is that they want us to believe, it's believability is based on some underlying Deep Propaganda.  If a reporter has internalized that Deep Propaganda, he or she will not even notice that there IS a basis for the Overt Propaganda--it will just seem "logical" or "realistic."

And, like everyone else, the more privileged a journalist is, the less likely they are to question prevailing ideas, since these are the ideas that endorse their privilege, and often make their privilege invisible to them.  By "privilege," I mean things like being college-educated, earning a six-figure salary, being "white" or being a member of the majority in other ways, socializing with the rich and powerful, and so forth.

Now factor in the profit-seeking nature of our information infrastructure, as huge corporations buy up media outlets and increase their profits by "cutting costs."  As reporting staffs are cut back and resources, especially at the less-powerful regional newspapers and TV stations, shrink, a smaller and smaller group of journalists and editors in New York and Washington end up setting  the agenda for the entire nation, and that small group is increasingly made up of society's "winners."

This is not a conspiracy, and "the media" is not "trying" to push a certain view of the world.  But it's very difficult for a reporter who consistently questions the status quo to rise in the ranks to be a chief editor at NBC or the head of the New York Times Baghdad bureau.

So, to sum up, here's how information workers, and especially workers in the media, distribute Propaganda:

1. Deep Propaganda is unconscious ideology, often created by people long ago and far away, but reinforced all the time;

2. Deep Propaganda can be challenged or reinforced;

3. Reinforcement happens unconsciously.  It's the default, meaning that it happens unless someone consciously decides to challenge it;

4. When an idea achieves hegemonic status, few are conscious of it.  The more advantaged, or  privileged, one is, the less likely one is to be conscious of it, or willing to challenge it;

5.  In today's world, the agenda-setting information workers are Winners, that is, they are largely drawn from the privileged groups;

6.  Those winners increasingly set the agenda for public discussion for the nation;

7.  By failing to challenge the Deep Propaganda that underlies the stories they consider important, the mass media unconsciously reinforces the ideology that is dominant.  This is when information workers become Propaganda distributors.

top