Number 309 October 7, 2005

This Week:

Quote of the Week
Sign Up for Nygaard Media Class Now (if you're going to...)
Hurricane Response I: The "Domestic Security Initiative"
Hurricane Response II: "An Unnatural Disaster"
Grassroots Hurricane Relief, and Beyond

Greetings,

Much of this week's issue is nothing more than extensive quotations from a couple of groups who are talking about and writing down some responses to Hurricane Katrina that are in stark contrast to the so-called "conservative response" that I discussed at length last week.  You know, that one that desires to "bring conservative, free-market ideas to the Gulf Coast."

I can't say when, but I believe voices like these--not ONLY these, certainly--will soon be the predominant voices heard in this country.  How long will it take for the moral bankruptcy of the Bush vision to become clear to enough people for that to happen?  I don't know, but there are so many grassroots groups already working to make change that I can't help but be hopeful.  I think that, after reading some of these words, you will be more hopeful, too.

It's unusual for Nygaard Notes to rely so much on the words of others, but I do so this week for two reasons.  First of all, their words are eloquent and clear, and I don't think I could do better.  Secondly, these words--from fairly significant organizations with long track records--have been almost totally ignored by the mass media, to the point that I imagine a lot of typical United Statesians might think that there ARE no responses like these to be heard.  If you know some people whose picture of the world comes from the media, maybe you should forward them this issue of the Notes...

Special note to email readers: This is the first issue sent out on my new email program, so if you have any problems, that's why.  Be sure and let me know so I can fix them.

In hope and solidarity,

Nygaard

"Quote" of the Week:

"Facing South" is a newsletter covering news and trends in the South, published by the Institute for Southern Studies and Southern Exposure magazine. In their October 7th issue appeared the following words:

"What's at stake is the question of what road to reconstruction will win out in the Gulf.  Public sector jobs with good wages and benefits are just the kind of economic 'anchor' the region needs right now--especially for African-American workers, who have found opportunities in government work that aren't available elsewhere.

"It seems New Orleans and the entire Gulf Coast have a unique opportunity for fresh new ideas about public investment in the wake of Katrina.  How many families and neighborhoods could benefit from a well-funded 'reconstruction corps' that pays residents to get involved in their city's renewal--delivering relief aid, fixing up homes and schools, remediating devastated wetlands?  It would do more for the local economy than the current contracting racket, which according to the Washington Post has sent 90% of post-Katrina work to businesses outside the region.

"Dozens of grassroots, Gulf-based groups are striving mightily for a 'people's reconstruction' that is democratic, just, and sustainable.  Yet an array of powerful business and political interests have other ideas--pushing hard and fast for "cleaning out" poor neighborhoods, loosening standards that protect workers and the environment, and leaving those most affected out of the decisions that will shape their future.

"These episodes reveal the two clear choices before us for Gulf reconstruction: On one side, a road that hands over the reins to those who seek profit and political advantage.  On the other, a road that values democracy, justice and investing in the public good.  Or as Martin Luther King, Jr. put it: chaos or community.

"A humane and vibrant program for rebuilding the Gulf is still possible. But every day, decisions are being made that threaten to wash it away--a dangerous prospect for the people in the Gulf, and a terrible lost opportunity for the entire country."


Sign Up for Nygaard Media Class Now (if you're going to...)

I mentioned back in July that I would be teaching a class called "Through the Imperial Lens: How the Media Shapes American Understanding of the Arab World, and What We Can Do about It."

The class will be starting in less than two weeks, and there are still slots open if you want to sign up.  But you'd better do it soon, y'know.

The class is sponsored by the Arab-American cultural organization MIZNA, and they are also offering some other classes.

"Through the Imperial Lens" will run on six consecutive Tuesday nights, from 6:30 to 8:30, starting on October 18th.  That's coming right up!  It costs $150, or a mere $25 per class.

A few of you Nygaard Notes readers have taken classes that I have facilitated, and you told me that you had a good time.  For those of you who have not, contact me if you would like more information, or go to the Mizna website at  http://www.mizna.org/classes/classes-media.html.

top

Hurricane Response I: The "Domestic Security Initiative"

The group OMBWatch, in their words, "was founded in 1983 to lift the veil of secrecy shrouding the powerful White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB).  The organization has since expanded its focus to include the substantive areas that OMB oversees."  This includes federal budget, taxation and government performance; information and access; nonprofit action, advocacy, policy and technology; and regulatory policy."  I've mentioned OMB Watch in these pages a few times over the years, and I have found their work to be unique and useful.

The folks at OMB Watch have proposed a five-point "Katrina response" that they are tentatively calling the "Domestic Security Initiative."  The point of the initiative, they summarize as follows:

"The board and staff of OMB Watch has been dismayed, even outraged, by what has transpired in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.  The limited and poorly coordinated government response is a direct consequence of the 'starve the beast' mindset that has dominated our nation's capital in recent years.  The era of less government and unquestioned reliance on the private sector must end.  In its place must be a renewed commitment to creating responsive government institutions and policies that address not only the immediate problems in the Gulf Coast, but also the underlying inequities that existed in the region before Hurricane Katrina and that still exist today in far too many areas of our country."

The five points of their "Domestic Security Initiative" are: Addressing our Infrastructure Needs; Protecting our Environment; Investing in our People; Strengthening our Economy; and Protecting our Communities.  They're worth reading, and they also have a survey that you can fill out to give feedback on their approach (including ideas for a better name!).

If you want to read the whole work-in-progress--or give feedback--you can find it at:  http://www.ombwatch.org.

top

Hurricane Response II: "An Unnatural Disaster"

The Center for Progressive Reform was founded in 2002 as, in their words, "a nonprofit research and educational organization dedicated to protecting health, safety, and the environment through analysis and commentary."  They "reject the view that the economic efficiency of private markets should be the only value used to guide government action."

The CPR put out a report last month in response to the devastation caused by Hurricane Katrina.  Called "An Unnatural Disaster: The Aftermath of Hurricane Katrina," the 56-page report received zero coverage in the U.S. press.

The philosophy of government upon which this new report is based was spelled out earlier this year by the CPR in a book called "A New Progressive Agenda for Public Health and the Environment."  The book "sets out a series of fundamental principles that animate a vision of the positive and vital role of government."  Here are some of those principles, with a few selected quotes from the text that indicate how the principles apply to Hurricane Katrina:

ADDRESS THE SOURCE NOT THE VICTIM:  We all benefit if government takes seriously its duty to protect the public from harm instead of shifting the burden to the individuals most affected...

REDUCE IGNORANCE / DEMOCRACY DEMANDS DISCLOSURE:  The hurricane highlights the vital importance of collection and disclosure of information about potentially hazardous substances produced, used, and stored by a wide array of industries.

BETTER SAFE THAN SORRY:  A precautionary approach to planning and preparation for such emergencies may be both necessary to satisfy the American public's basic moral impulses, and [it may also be] a sound investment.

BE FAIR: A commitment to improving the well-being of all Americans requires that there be a fair distribution of environmental and other burdens.  The widespread outrage over the failures of the evacuation and emergency response suggests that Americans are committed to a legal status quo that takes greater account of fundamental fairness.

PUBLIC RESOURCES BELONG TO EVERYONE

MAKE GOVERNMENT WORK: Government has a vital role to play in protecting life and property from natural and man-made disasters and in helping the recovery from such disasters.  But government requires adequate funding and appropriately structured institutions to perform these critical roles.

* Notable Words from the Report *

In addition to the above principles, there are many specific places where the CPR articulates, in clear and simple language, some of the various issues raised by Hurricane Katrina.  Here is a selection of my favorite words from the rest of the report:

"Conservatives ...interpret the failure of the government to respond effectively to Katrina as proof of their belief that government is always inept because governmental bureaucracies are by their very nature ineffective."

"Some have begun to argue that the failures of government counsel a course of reducing the responsibilities of government by waiving environmental and worker protections, shielding wrongdoers from liability, and relying even more on the private sector.  But using the Katrina disaster as an excuse to enact simplistic prescriptions for reducing governmental protections, limiting governmental accountability, and enriching favored business constituencies would be a serious mistake."

"The governmental failures revealed by Katrina are not the failures of a progressive government. While we do not yet understand exactly what went wrong, the evidence assembled here makes this much clear: some of the needless death and destruction in New Orleans is attributable to a rejection of progressive principles and to a hollowing out of the government that left it without the resources and experienced personnel needed to fulfill its vital role of protecting people and the environment."

"From a progressive perspective, the lesson that Katrina teaches is that we must redouble efforts for better government.  The kind of planning and execution demanded by a disaster like Katrina simply cannot be carried out without competent government that is adequately funded, has its eyes on the proper priorities. and is genuinely concerned with the public good and the empowerment of all citizens."

"It is clear even at this early stage that the Hurricane Katrina tragedy is not a wakeup call, as some have described it; rather, it is a consequence of past wake-up calls unheeded."

"When a society fails to protect its most vulnerable citizens--its children, its struggling single mothers, its sick and its elderly--from the forces of nature and a winner-take-all system of economic rewards, consequences inevitably ensue."

"To the extent that the inquiries [into the failure of our emergency management systems and institutions] focus solely on examples of individual incompetence, there is ample reason to worry that they will not focus on the right questions.  Focusing on incompetence as the root cause of the problems risks ignoring the underlying conditions that made it easier, perhaps even inevitable, for those public servants to fail."

"A host of government decisions were made [before Katrina]--each of which had the potential to mitigate or exacerbate the effects of a hurricane for the people of New Orleans--against a social, economic, and political backdrop that made the disproportionate impacts of certain government choices virtually inevitable.  Where the choice was to forego the basic services and protections typically provided by a government, it should have been clear to decision makers precisely who would be left to fend for themselves.  In fact, it is not only the case that government decision makers should have known just who would be left to suffer the harms of protections foregone, but that they did know."

"In New Orleans race is in fact an important variable in understanding the spatial layout in terms of proximity to polluting facilities, access to public amenities, and, ... protection (whether natural or built) from floods."

"The fact that the deaths, losses, and indignities of Katrina disproportionately affected people of color and the poor is not at all extraordinary.  Hurricane Katrina may be a catastrophic, once in a lifetime, event.  But the same disregard by government health, safety, and environmental agencies for the lives and circumstances of the most vulnerable marks the everyday experience of these  people."

"Blacks remain underrepresented in the relevant decision making bodies, including government regulatory agencies... Those affected have often been denied the opportunity meaningfully to participate in decisions affecting their health, safety and environment."

"It is already clear that the plans for the city's future will be contested.  If decisions about that future are to be just, they cannot be made--as so many decisions have been in the past--through processes that exclude New Orleans people of color and poor."

If you'd like to read the report yourself, go to: http://www.progressivereform.org/Unnatural_Disaster_512.pdf .  I particularly recommend the section "The Two Americas: Race, Class, and Injustice," found on pages 34-40.  It explains really simply how institutional racism works.  Look at the "Critical Questions" on page 39.

top

Grassroots Hurricane Relief, and Beyond

Most of this issue is just words.  Inspiring though they may be (and I hope they are), it's important to know that there are many, many groups that are working WITHIN and IN SOLIDARITY WITH the hurricane-affected communities to carry out the promise of these words.  Go to the following websites to find links to some of the best of the groups.  Maybe you are in some of them!  If not, think about joining up, or at least sending a donation.

"Grassroots/Low-income/People of Color-led Hurricane Katrina Relief" groups: http://katrina.mayfirst.org/ .

"Socially Responsible Katrina Relief" from a radical librarian (my favorite kind!): http://radicalreference.info/altkatrinarelief .

Remember, I'm not personally involved with, nor specifically endorsing, any of the groups you find here.  If, for some reason, you want my personal recommendations, get in touch with me.

top